When it doesn't fit anywhere else
 #24365  by gratefuljay
 
I know this is a Dead site and i looked as long as my attn. span could hold out for a Beatle forum, but anyone have any thought on the movie coming out? Who owns the bands music now? They showed a bunch of clips on Oprah today(yes,I said Oprah). It just seemed to me the spirit of the music is lost, because they use it to tell their own story. But i guess interpretation is what music is all about. Wah wahwah wah wahwahwah (Peanuts reference) Rambling your GratefulJay :peas:

 #24371  by JackORoses
 
your talking about "across the universe" correct? If so I think it looks pretty good, I saw a long preview for it when I saw Spiderman 3 in theaters a few months back, ill definately check it out

 #24440  by zoppenheimer
 
I believe Micael Jackson currently has rights to most of the Beatles tunes

 #24444  by shakedown_04092
 
zoppenheimer wrote:I believe Micael Jackson currently has rights to most of the Beatles tunes
I think he had to sell them off (or most of them) last year due to financial reasons, maybe to BMG?

 #24445  by gratephulphish123
 
shakedown_04092 wrote:
zoppenheimer wrote:I believe Micael Jackson currently has rights to most of the Beatles tunes
I think he had to sell them off (or most of them) last year due to financial reasons, maybe to BMG?
i thought he sold em to sony?

 #24453  by tigerstrat
 
I saw the Oprah previews too. Anybody remember the Sgt. Peppers movie from the 70's starring the Bee Gees? Well this looks nearly as bad as that was. :shock:

I have absolutely no intention of altering my long-held and ever-evolving perceptions of Beatles music by seeing this very stagey/Broadwayesque-looking (and especially -sounding) production... but I'm sure it was a sincere labor of love and I suppose on the bright side it might serve to expose the next generation of Beatles listeners to their genius.

 #24455  by shakedown_04092
 
tigerstrat wrote:I saw the Oprah previews too. Anybody remember the Sgt. Peppers movie from the 70's starring the Bee Gees? Well this looks nearly as bad as that was. :shock:

I have absolutely no intention of altering my long-held and ever-evolving perceptions of Beatles music by seeing this very stagey/Broadwayesque-looking (and especially -sounding) production... but I'm sure it was a sincere labor of love and I suppose on the bright side it might serve to expose the next generation of Beatles listeners to their genius.
Well said, I'm with you on this one.

 #24512  by Django
 
Have you ever seen a good movie about a musician? At least in the rock era? I suppose LaBamba had it's moments and maybe even the Buddy Holly story, but generally they are bad. I did like that made for TV Beatles movie that showed a young George being commented on my his mates because he was practicing so hard his fingers were bleeding.

 #24537  by tigerstrat
 
Django wrote:Have you ever seen a good movie about a musician? At least in the rock era? I suppose LaBamba had it's moments and maybe even the Buddy Holly story, but generally they are bad. I did like that made for TV Beatles movie that showed a young George being commented on my his mates because he was practicing so hard his fingers were bleeding.
This isn't a movie about the musicians. It's a fantasy story interpetated from the songs themselves.

But I have seen plenty of great biopic movies about musicians: La Bamba is a good one. Walk The Line, for a more recent example. Coal Miner's Daughter... Amadeus (oops, not very Rock era) My favorite Beatles biopic by far is Backbeat(Dir:Iain Softley, 1994)

 #24553  by jackr
 
About 6 months ago I rented Yellow Submarine and watched with my 8 year old and 4 year old. They loved it and they were singing tunes from it for days.

I love all the beatles (even ringo) and of course John was great but my favorite was George. What a great musician and song writer.

 #24557  by AugustWest
 
I agree george was the man. I loved his solo album he realesed right after the split. My sweet lord was one of the first songs I learned to play. (now that I think about it I don't remember how to play it anymore, better get to practicing) Not a prolific songwritter but it's quality over quanitity. Not that the john/paul combo was low quality. What a great band.

 #24559  by jackr
 
Didn't George get sued and lost for My Sweet Lord too closely resembling He's So Fine?

 #24582  by tigerstrat
 
AugustWest wrote:I agree george was the man. I loved his solo album he realesed right after the split. My sweet lord was one of the first songs I learned to play. (now that I think about it I don't remember how to play it anymore, better get to practicing) Not a prolific songwritter but it's quality over quanitity. Not that the john/paul combo was low quality. What a great band.
Not a prolific songwriter?! What do ya have to do to be considered prolific?? GH certainly fit the bill in my book.

 #24588  by AugustWest
 
Yeah that didn't come out like I intended it. Not as prolific as the other two (john amd paul), was the pont I was trying to make. However if I had to give you a top ten of my favorite beatles songs he would have about 7 of them in there and he wrote much less then the other two for the band.

 #24606  by Shooster
 
Not to mention his involvement in the Traveling Wilburys, which was a stroke of Genius by all involved.