Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Mon Apr 11, 2011 3:27 pm
If you play live, and this doesn't happen, you are obviously doing something wrong 
Grateful Dead Music Forum
A place to talk about the music of the Grateful Dead
https://www.rukind.com/
Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
Page 1 of 3
Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Mon Apr 11, 2011 3:36 pm
I edited the title and very much agree.
Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Mon Apr 11, 2011 3:42 pm
Thanks Strummin! I (obviously) didn't think about that 
Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Mon Apr 11, 2011 7:26 pm
Any idea what show this was from--or was it photoshopped? Bobby looks kind of 72-ish, although I'm no expert.
Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Tue Apr 12, 2011 12:16 am
well the only thing we can say for sure is that she was on a fucking good one
Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:31 am
I've seen this many times over the years and a few things strike me as strange:
- lighting
- nothing else behind her
- panty string looks perfect when the rest of the photo is a bit grainy.
- lighting
- nothing else behind her
- panty string looks perfect when the rest of the photo is a bit grainy.
Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Tue Apr 12, 2011 6:43 am
rated R? For a graphic depiction of a man at work?
Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:06 am
seamones wrote:rated R? For a graphic depiction of a man at work?Are you joking? Folks read this forum at work and at home with kids running around.
Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:35 am
i just find it rather shocking that a topless female is still considered somehow not only inappropriate but 'dirty.' If it were a dude standing there without his shirt would that be safe for kids and work? Its not like there is anything sexual or remotely suggestive about this photo. Personally, I just can't get my head around the concept that this would be harmful to my kid.
Sorry, its a bit of a personal rant, which is generally frowned upon - have at me!
Sorry, its a bit of a personal rant, which is generally frowned upon - have at me!
Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:51 am
I think I have seen that pic from a diff angle .... I know there is at least one more Bob n breast shot out there ... who's got it ?
Early 70's .... real acid .... hippie chick ..... is naked ... makes sense to me
Early 70's .... real acid .... hippie chick ..... is naked ... makes sense to me
Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:26 am
seamones wrote:i just find it rather shocking that a topless female is still considered somehow not only inappropriate but 'dirty.' If it were a dude standing there without his shirt would that be safe for kids and work? Its not like there is anything sexual or remotely suggestive about this photo. Personally, I just can't get my head around the concept that this would be harmful to my kid.Chill out. Who said innapropriate or dirty? nobody! so stop looking for a fight. In fact I agreed with the OP and said, "and very much agree.'
Sorry, its a bit of a personal rant, which is generally frowned upon - have at me!
I put it rated R so someone at work won't be seen with tits on the screen or a dad won't have to explain a naked chick to a kid.
Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:59 am
strumminsix wrote:I'm chill. No fights, and I don't want to argue semantics with you. Just been thinking a lot about what is appropriate for kids and the images we are bombarded with by the media, from gratutious violence to non-stop viagra ads. To me the last thing I am concerned about is a topless chick having a good time.seamones wrote:i just find it rather shocking that a topless female is still considered somehow not only inappropriate but 'dirty.' If it were a dude standing there without his shirt would that be safe for kids and work? Its not like there is anything sexual or remotely suggestive about this photo. Personally, I just can't get my head around the concept that this would be harmful to my kid.Chill out. Who said innapropriate or dirty? nobody! so stop looking for a fight. In fact I agreed with the OP and said, "and very much agree.'
Sorry, its a bit of a personal rant, which is generally frowned upon - have at me!
I put it rated R so someone at work won't be seen with tits on the screen or a dad won't have to explain a naked chick to a kid.
Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:15 am
seamones wrote:I'm chill. No fights, and I don't want to argue semantics with you. Just been thinking a lot about what is appropriate for kids and the images we are bombarded with by the media, from gratutious violence to non-stop viagra ads. To me the last thing I am concerned about is a topless chick having a good time.There are no semantics being argued. I like the pic but believe the thread deserves a warning. If you can't accept that, fine.
If you are a parent it's your choice what you show your kids... Even if its a naked chick dancing or whatever is on TV.
For this place, it's partly my choice and that was to give a warning on the subject line as an admin fine but as a member I say THANK YOU to Coolbreez and agree with him that I'm doing it wrong!
Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:27 am
strumminsix wrote: and agree with him that I'm doing it wrong!Yup! Me too.
Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc
PostPosted:Tue Apr 12, 2011 9:31 am
seamones wrote:strumminsix wrote: and agree with him that I'm doing it wrong!Yup! Me too.
