rukind.com

A place to talk about the music of the Grateful Dead 

It is currently Wed Sep 16, 2026 10:27 pm

Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc

When it doesn't fit anywhere else
 Reply

Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc

 #96733  by seamones
 
i just find it rather shocking that a topless female is still considered somehow not only inappropriate but 'dirty.' If it were a dude standing there without his shirt would that be safe for kids and work? Its not like there is anything sexual or remotely suggestive about this photo. Personally, I just can't get my head around the concept that this would be harmful to my kid.

Sorry, its a bit of a personal rant, which is generally frowned upon - have at me!

Image

Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc

 #96738  by strumminsix
 
seamones wrote:i just find it rather shocking that a topless female is still considered somehow not only inappropriate but 'dirty.' If it were a dude standing there without his shirt would that be safe for kids and work? Its not like there is anything sexual or remotely suggestive about this photo. Personally, I just can't get my head around the concept that this would be harmful to my kid.

Sorry, its a bit of a personal rant, which is generally frowned upon - have at me!
Chill out. Who said innapropriate or dirty? nobody! so stop looking for a fight. In fact I agreed with the OP and said, "and very much agree.'

I put it rated R so someone at work won't be seen with tits on the screen or a dad won't have to explain a naked chick to a kid.

Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc

 #96741  by seamones
 
strumminsix wrote:
seamones wrote:i just find it rather shocking that a topless female is still considered somehow not only inappropriate but 'dirty.' If it were a dude standing there without his shirt would that be safe for kids and work? Its not like there is anything sexual or remotely suggestive about this photo. Personally, I just can't get my head around the concept that this would be harmful to my kid.

Sorry, its a bit of a personal rant, which is generally frowned upon - have at me!
Chill out. Who said innapropriate or dirty? nobody! so stop looking for a fight. In fact I agreed with the OP and said, "and very much agree.'

I put it rated R so someone at work won't be seen with tits on the screen or a dad won't have to explain a naked chick to a kid.
I'm chill. No fights, and I don't want to argue semantics with you. Just been thinking a lot about what is appropriate for kids and the images we are bombarded with by the media, from gratutious violence to non-stop viagra ads. To me the last thing I am concerned about is a topless chick having a good time.

Re: Bobby's digging it! --> Rated R, no kids, work, etc

 #96742  by strumminsix
 
seamones wrote:I'm chill. No fights, and I don't want to argue semantics with you. Just been thinking a lot about what is appropriate for kids and the images we are bombarded with by the media, from gratutious violence to non-stop viagra ads. To me the last thing I am concerned about is a topless chick having a good time.
There are no semantics being argued. I like the pic but believe the thread deserves a warning. If you can't accept that, fine.

If you are a parent it's your choice what you show your kids... Even if its a naked chick dancing or whatever is on TV.

For this place, it's partly my choice and that was to give a warning on the subject line as an admin fine but as a member I say THANK YOU to Coolbreez and agree with him that I'm doing it wrong!
 Reply
 Return to “Everything Else”
Powered By phpBB -
HandCrafted With  and  By SiteSplat ©SiteSplat 2013
 - All times are UTC-07:00 -