Page 2 of 2

PostPosted:Sun Sep 21, 2008 12:12 pm
by tigerstrat
Emoto wrote:I will also include in that sentiment The Allman Brothers without Dickie.
If you want to go there, I'll go you one better. No Allman Bros. Band w/o Duane.

PostPosted:Sun Sep 21, 2008 12:12 pm
by tigerstrat
ebick wrote:......but Jerry's dead......it's not the same thing. The other members of Yes were simply impatient and did this behind Jon's back. That's just crap.
You're saying this was done without Anderson's blessing?

PostPosted:Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:19 pm
by Emoto
tigerstrat wrote:
Emoto wrote:I will also include in that sentiment The Allman Brothers without Dickie.
If you want to go there, I'll go you one better. No Allman Bros. Band w/o Duane.
Yeah, you could say that, and I would understand. Much like no Grateful Dead without Jerry, or Little Feat without Lowell George.

However, I think the "without Dickie" thing is closer to what is going on with Yes, as both Dickie and Jon are alive and it is the other band members choosing to tour without them.

Based on what is on Jon Anderson's site, it may well be without his blessing.

PostPosted:Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:36 pm
by ebick
tigerstrat wrote:
ebick wrote:......but Jerry's dead......it's not the same thing. The other members of Yes were simply impatient and did this behind Jon's back. That's just crap.
You're saying this was done without Anderson's blessing?
This is what it says at http://jonanderson.com/news.html
September 18, 2008

Disappointed, and very Disrespected

Disappointed that, with the exception of one phone call from Alan, none of the guys have been in touch since my illness, just to find out how I am doing, and how we will foresee the future for YES. And disappointed that they were not willing to wait till 2009 when I’m fully recovered.

And I feel very disrespected, having spent most of this year creating songs and constant ideas for the band, spending time with Roger Dean creating a stage design, also working with VH1 and Sirius and XM Radio to help promote the welfare of YES.

Getting sick was not "on my radar”, and I thank my own angel Janeee and my family for helping me through this difficult time, and the many well wishers, friends and fans alike, for understanding that ''things happen''.

Of course I wish the guys all the best in their 'solo' work, but I just wish this could have been done in a more gentlemanly fashion. After all YES is a precious musical band.

This is not YES on tour...

I send best wishes to one and all,



Jon Anderson
September 2008
Jon was a lot mre diplomatic than I would have been. To me this is almost as direspectful as Townshend and Daltry playing a Who concert the day after Entwhistle died.

PostPosted:Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:55 pm
by wisedyes
I follow Yes fairly closely, and the original diagnosis for Jon Anderson was that he was done as far as singing / touring / performing goes. Now, maybe he, being an amazingly positive person, wishes to believe otherwise, but the word on the Yes web site at the time was that Yes was pretty much through.

If the other guys decide to carry on without him, although I personally don't see it as being "authentically" Yes, then that's their call, I suppose. I mean, in reality, Yes has been through numerous personnel changes through the years, and Howe, Wakeman and White aren't even original members themselves, so there you go.

After all, Yes did put out an album without Jon Anderson previously. This isn't the first time they've toured without him.

PostPosted:Sun Sep 21, 2008 3:04 pm
by ebick
wisedyes wrote:I follow Yes fairly closely, and the original diagnosis for Jon Anderson was that he was done as far as singing / touring / performing goes.
Where did you see that? I thought I had seen that he was told to lay off for 6 months.
wisedyes wrote:After all, Yes did put out an album without Jon Anderson previously. This isn't the first time they've toured without him.
But a "Jon" from a tribute band? I don't know man.....it wreaks to me.

PostPosted:Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:20 pm
by tigerstrat
ebick wrote:
wisedyes wrote:I follow Yes fairly closely, and the original diagnosis for Jon Anderson was that he was done as far as singing / touring / performing goes.
Where did you see that? I thought I had seen that he was told to lay off for 6 months.
wisedyes wrote:After all, Yes did put out an album without Jon Anderson previously. This isn't the first time they've toured without him.
But a "Jon" from a tribute band? I don't know man.....it wreaks to me.
Thanks for posting Jon's side of it. Yep, that pretty much a dirty lowdown move. All good people? Questionable.

PostPosted:Sun Sep 21, 2008 10:01 pm
by krzykat
Emoto wrote:
I'm with you on that one.

I will also include in that sentiment The Allman Brothers without Dickie.

ETA: An old friend of mine I was in a few bands with did a lot of show lighting work with Jon Anderson a few years back. He told me Jon was a very, very nice guy and treated everyone with kindness, so that makes it a little worse, in my eyes. He spent a lot of time riding in cars with Anderson for whatever reason, and played him one of our old band tapes. I can't recall now if my friend, or Jon said it, but it was said that "it sounds like Yes joined with the Grateful Dead" (which it sort of did, me being the deadhead and my friend being into Yes) upon hearing this, Jon's wife said words to the effect of "Is Yes merging with the Grateful Dead"? They both just kind of looked at her in shock... :lol:
You mean Allman brother right! three is only one in the band now

PostPosted:Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:01 am
by Emoto
krzykat wrote:You mean Allman brother right! three is only one in the band now
For some reason, they never dropped that "s" from their name.

PostPosted:Sun Sep 28, 2008 6:01 am
by Rusty the Scoob
It sure looks like it by Jon's site, linked above. That's disappointing... I have tickets already and didn't realize there was a behind-the-scenes drama (no pun intended) brewing.