I'd be curious to hear folks' thoughts on this.
A couple years ago I got together with a guy I met who is a singer-songwriter. He had a ton of originals that he wanted to finish and record. I play guitar, and he thought I could contribute to his songs. We found a bass player and drummer within a few months and got to rehearsing. We polished up about a dozen songs to record, and they sounded pretty good. These were very short songs with no jams--all my solos were scripted (at the singer's request, as this was really his gig). We recorded the songs in the studio in just a couple days on his dime, and the rough cuts were good.
Mixing and dubbing went on for months, and there was a lot of overdubbing. He paid for all the studio time, and I didn't really want to get involved in all the dubbing and retracking and remixing because it was his money, and he could be as obsessive as he could afford to be. The band stopped playing together about a year ago because he had conflicting life needs at the time, and he couldn't focus on the band. I was OK with that because I started to feel he was too controlling about the music. I had had a good experience, and life goes on.
Anyway, he finally finished the CD, and he sent me a copy. It sounds good, and most of my guitar parts were preserved. But some of my guitar parts that I was real proud of were taken out and replaced with different solos played by someone else. I didn't know this would happen, although I confess I haven't talked much with this guy lately. I know it was the singer's call, and I knew ahead of time it was his money paying for the studio and his songs, but I can't help feeling a little miffed. I figured that asa member of the band my contributions would be preserved, but I guess it wasn't really a band as much as me being a sideman.
Anyone have a similar experience? Is it your sense this is business as usual?
JK
A couple years ago I got together with a guy I met who is a singer-songwriter. He had a ton of originals that he wanted to finish and record. I play guitar, and he thought I could contribute to his songs. We found a bass player and drummer within a few months and got to rehearsing. We polished up about a dozen songs to record, and they sounded pretty good. These were very short songs with no jams--all my solos were scripted (at the singer's request, as this was really his gig). We recorded the songs in the studio in just a couple days on his dime, and the rough cuts were good.
Mixing and dubbing went on for months, and there was a lot of overdubbing. He paid for all the studio time, and I didn't really want to get involved in all the dubbing and retracking and remixing because it was his money, and he could be as obsessive as he could afford to be. The band stopped playing together about a year ago because he had conflicting life needs at the time, and he couldn't focus on the band. I was OK with that because I started to feel he was too controlling about the music. I had had a good experience, and life goes on.
Anyway, he finally finished the CD, and he sent me a copy. It sounds good, and most of my guitar parts were preserved. But some of my guitar parts that I was real proud of were taken out and replaced with different solos played by someone else. I didn't know this would happen, although I confess I haven't talked much with this guy lately. I know it was the singer's call, and I knew ahead of time it was his money paying for the studio and his songs, but I can't help feeling a little miffed. I figured that asa member of the band my contributions would be preserved, but I guess it wasn't really a band as much as me being a sideman.
Anyone have a similar experience? Is it your sense this is business as usual?
JK
...things we've never seen will seem familiar...
