Iv never been to Schwagfest, It might be this festival just gets out of hand real bad
tigerstrat wrote:That's what you get for being successful as a promoter, but not owned by a giant media corporation.
tcsned wrote:lame, lame, lameI know we shy away from politics around here, but don't we live in the USA? Didn't the (Old) constitution try to protect us from this very thing?
JonnyBoy wrote:As George Clinton once said, "they make more money pretending they're stopping it than the kids do selling it." It's all about the money and nothing to due with public safety.tigerstrat wrote:That's what you get for being successful as a promoter, but not owned by a giant media corporation.tcsned wrote:lame, lame, lameI know we shy away from politics around here, but don't we live in the USA? Didn't the (Old) constitution try to protect us from this very thing?
Is it me, or does this just scare the crap out of you? I mean, I understand breaking the law and paying the piper, but to destroy a person completely over something that goes on at many different venues, something he did not do personally (wasn't charged with a crime), even with the DEA "keeping control" at other concerts, its obvious there is no control. In the same context, One could easily blame them for all the drugs/problems they supposedly protect us from and fail at big venue concerts. it is scary how many laws are out there that can be used to do the exact thing to any one of us, that may or may not be ever enforced in many other situations.The GOVT can demolish your existence when you don't even see it coming... I am sure if the DEA came to him and asked/threatened to take action he would have complied. This looks like a premeditated land/asset snarfing. It is totally NOT AMERICAN, imo. we ask nicely before we snarf around here.