ker1227 wrote:And damn, could he use somemore scales besides the blues scale
Huh???? I'm gonna leave that one alone too

. But to say it couldn't be further from the truth is an understatement.
As for this question, obviously being on a GD site, Jer is gonna get the overwhelming nod here. But I've gotta side with the folks who say it's a tie, or rather, that you can't compare the two, sans the fact that they both made incredible music and are viewed as not only the "leaders" of their bands but musical icons as well. Let's just leave it at that.
I'm a big a fan as Jerry & Trey as there is, and have learned more from
each of them than any other guitarists out there, but I don't think anyone can, in good faith, say that Trey's less of a guitarist than Jerry. And those who are saying that aren't fully informed, IMHO. The 2 are just different, and both equally good in their own right.
Their musical styles differ vastly because of who they were influenced by, but because Trey learned a lot from Jerry, and was quoted saying he wouldn't be where he was today without discovering Jer (his other big guitar influences being Zappa & Hendrix), you're gonna hear
some similarities in their playing. But Trey took a lot of his music in a way different direction than Jerry did, and that has proved an invaluable learning tool for myself and my "theory understanding quest". Listen to songs like Divided Sky, Reba, David Bowie, YEM, or Fluffhead and you'll know what I mean. 80-90% of those songs are structured and written out (think: Terrapin on steroids....lots of parts with some free-form jams in there as well) with some CRAZY parts to them that are pure genius and once you can handle following the songs, you start to appreciate the beauty of them. Sort of like Bach or Beethoven when they wrote some of their scores or symphonies years and years ago (you know what I mean).
This may piss some people off, but I've always considered a true Phish fan, especailly one that plays guitar/music, to be a little more, uh....discerning, I guess, when it comes to the ability to follow & understand music as a whole. It's jus that once I understood Phish's music and where they were coming from, it made learning & understanding the Dead soooo much easier. I hesitate to use a phrase like "more intelligent listener" when describing that, because I don't intend for it to come off the wrong way, but, even as many people have stated before on this site (and I'm trying not to stereotype, but typically it's a lot of the older, more traditional 'heads) they just don't "get" Phish or Trey's music, like it's over their head or something. The thing about the Dead's music is that it's "easy listening". Lots of familiar chords, and very much follows the guidlines of "western music" as a whole, and because of that, I think it's easier to understand and attach oneself to (me included!). Now the jams that they get into......those don't apply to that statement as much, but it's all tied together. Phish's music is, for the most part, more complex/structured/symphonic rock, so to speak, and isn't going to make it super easy to understand or latch onto, but once you do "get it", it's true beauty is revealed. Hope that came out right......
My only advice is to listen more. Coming from a tride and true Deadhead, it'll getcha eventually.
But back to the argument at hand: It's kind of like saying that Babe Ruth is the better home run hitter than Hank Aaron, or that Larry Bird was a better basketball player than Oscar Robertson, or that Barry Sanders was a better running back than Jim Brown. It's fun to spark debate and argue the point one way or another, but in the end, it's 2 different parts in history, 2 different subjects & participants (for the most part), and 2 different legacies.
I like 'em both EQUALLY!
