by ugly rumor » Sat Apr 02, 2011 10:41 pm
People often think that the old blues recordings are of people who only sang blues. That is patently not correct. The old songsters sang blues, but also showtunes, country, popular music, anything that would encourage good tips in the guitar case or piano glass. They recorded blues because that is what the record companies wanted and payed for. Then they were called "race" records, and major labels even went to the length of creating sub-labels to distance their mainstream "white" music from the black or mexican music, in order to not offend the prejudices of the time. Remember, the Ku Klux Klan was at its height in the 1920s, with roughly ten percent of Americans - not adults, but ALL Americans - at that time holding dues-paying membership in that organization. Also, lynchings, race riots in big cities such as Washington D.C., Tulsa, Oklahoma, Detroit, New york, Atlanta, were occurring regularly. So when a blues group or person recorded for a white man, he usually recorded what he thought the white man wanted to hear. And record scouts wanted what they thought would sell, which after Ma Rainey's recording in 1920, and Bessie Smith, Alberta Hunter, etc, was blues. So often words didn't really make as much sense, because the black man was projecting himself into what he percieved the white man's perception was. I have several thousand old blues recordings, from obscure to popular, from the 1920s, 30s, and 40s. The foregoing is from observations I have made to try to understand the proliferation of unmatched and mismatched song lyrics, along with my understanding of the craft.
Gone are the days we stopped to decide where we should go, we just ride...