How come Garcia's tone didn't suck in '92...

Re: How come Garcia's tone didn't suck in '92...

Postby hogan » Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:51 am

Riddle me this,
Why didn't Weir's tone suffer the same fate at the time? He was going into the same system and essentially direct.
Honest to the point of recklessness.
PM me for a cab
http://www.facebook.com/workingmansdead
Happy customers (~);-} :
paulinnc, spaceyrface43, AKdead, chuckles, ebelgee, Quebee, Kennay, bomall01, NashvilleMike, Strumminsix,jx2638,Chutley, Adam Deckard, jkstraw, TennesseeJedi, deadhead1988, spacefunkologist, rmackenzie
hogan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 762
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 6:01 pm

Re: How come Garcia's tone didn't suck in '92...

Postby strumminsix » Fri Sep 17, 2010 10:02 am

I've speculated some amount of hearing loss with Jerry for some time.

Maybe it was caused by a cavity? :lol:
User avatar
strumminsix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 6641
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 8:13 am
Location: Chicago

Re: How come Garcia's tone didn't suck in '92...

Postby playingdead » Fri Sep 17, 2010 1:04 pm

hogan wrote:Riddle me this,
Why didn't Weir's tone suffer the same fate at the time? He was going into the same system and essentially direct.


Weir had been playing full range speakers for years, since he started putting those Meyer MSL cabinets under the drum riser. He would have been accustomed to dialing in a tone without using a traditional guitar cabinet.
User avatar
playingdead
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1712
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:55 am
Location: Boston, MA

Previous

Return to Jerry Tone

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests