Riddle me this,
Why didn't Weir's tone suffer the same fate at the time? He was going into the same system and essentially direct.
How come Garcia's tone didn't suck in '92...
33 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: How come Garcia's tone didn't suck in '92...
by hogan » Fri Sep 17, 2010 9:51 am
Honest to the point of recklessness.
PM me for a cab
http://www.facebook.com/workingmansdead
Happy customers (~);-} :
paulinnc, spaceyrface43, AKdead, chuckles, ebelgee, Quebee, Kennay, bomall01, NashvilleMike, Strumminsix,jx2638,Chutley, Adam Deckard, jkstraw, TennesseeJedi, deadhead1988, spacefunkologist, rmackenzie
PM me for a cab
http://www.facebook.com/workingmansdead
Happy customers (~);-} :
paulinnc, spaceyrface43, AKdead, chuckles, ebelgee, Quebee, Kennay, bomall01, NashvilleMike, Strumminsix,jx2638,Chutley, Adam Deckard, jkstraw, TennesseeJedi, deadhead1988, spacefunkologist, rmackenzie
- hogan
- Senior Member
- Posts: 755
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 6:01 pm
Re: How come Garcia's tone didn't suck in '92...
by strumminsix » Fri Sep 17, 2010 10:02 am
I've speculated some amount of hearing loss with Jerry for some time.
Maybe it was caused by a cavity?
Maybe it was caused by a cavity?
-
strumminsix - Senior Member
- Posts: 6536
- Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 8:13 am
- Location: Chicago
Re: How come Garcia's tone didn't suck in '92...
by playingdead » Fri Sep 17, 2010 1:04 pm
hogan wrote:Riddle me this,
Why didn't Weir's tone suffer the same fate at the time? He was going into the same system and essentially direct.
Weir had been playing full range speakers for years, since he started putting those Meyer MSL cabinets under the drum riser. He would have been accustomed to dialing in a tone without using a traditional guitar cabinet.
-
playingdead - Senior Member
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:55 am
- Location: Boston, MA
33 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Mr.Burns and 2 guests