to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby austinhumphrey » Wed Mar 05, 2014 10:50 am

hello all, i just got a new setup and have been debating whether or not to add a stratoblaster to the mix. i recently bought a fender champion 100 and really like it so far. good sounding cleans and good gain channel with different voicings. i also got my first MIA strat with texas special pickups. i love the overall clean sound but it sounds like something is missing, i was doing some research and found that the clean channel on the my amp is modeled after a twin reverb, so i figured why not put a little more jerry in it with a stratoblaster? so here's my dilemma, i know that i would like to add a little boost but i'm not sure what the best way to do it is. i've seen some diy stratoblaster pedals, i know alembic makes a blaster input jack that goes right into the guitar, or should i try to find another pedal for the job? i'm not sure what the alembic blaster entails as far as instillation goes, and since it's a new guitar i'm not sure if i want to tear into it already. also price is a factor. what is everybody else doing, anybody try the diy pedals or input jack blaster? how bad are they to put together? or should i try something else all together? i am going to that early 70's tone. thanks, any input helps!
austinhumphrey
Rosebud
Rosebud
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 8:12 pm

Re: to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby austinhumphrey » Wed Mar 05, 2014 10:54 am

or is there a place that i can buy an already put together stratoblaster. i haven't seen it but that doesn't mean it's not there. thanks! :-)
austinhumphrey
Rosebud
Rosebud
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 8:12 pm

Re: to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby Tennessee Jedi » Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:13 am

I have one and like it .... sometimes I drive my Q tron with it
I have been using it more and more .... gives the guitar a bit of hair and sustain
I dont remember what the specs are ... its been a few years since it was installed in the guitar
:D
User avatar
Tennessee Jedi
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4223
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:29 am
Location: Bucks Co.Pa

Re: to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby austinhumphrey » Wed Mar 05, 2014 1:51 pm

http://www.alembic.com/support/blaster_photos.html
i found this, doesn't seem too bad.
austinhumphrey
Rosebud
Rosebud
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 8:12 pm

Re: to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby hippieguy1954 » Wed Mar 05, 2014 2:50 pm

Jim

First show: 1973
Last show: 1994
User avatar
hippieguy1954
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1249
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 1:29 pm
Location: Upstate, NY

Re: to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby milobender » Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:00 pm

I can make you a blaster in any configuration you want... and I use the original J230 FET... pm me if you want to talk about it.

Brian
Everything we know is wrong...
www.9mileskid.com
milobender
Jerry
Jerry
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:32 am
Location: SE Wyoming

Re: to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby bluemule » Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:01 pm

I have the Alembic one. I had it in a strat but found it was a PITA taking off the pickguard everytime I needed to change the battery. Figured I would eventually wear out the screw holes too. I ended up putting it in an enclosure. I really like it as a boost. Very warm and vintage sounding. You can adjust the gain to add some serious punch too without fuzzing out too bad.
Last edited by bluemule on Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
dead, mule, skb, dtb, abb, jgb, moe, phish, buddy guy, blue floyd, old&intheway
bluemule
Rosebud
Rosebud
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 2:34 am

Re: to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby TI4-1009 » Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:01 pm

I got a Waldo buffer for my SG/Wolf project, but I also have the GGG blaster coming. Not sure yet which- or both. If I go with the blaster I'm pretty sure I'd want it switched so I could turn it off for straight SG stuff if I wanted to, and also undecided about leaving the pot in the cavity or drilling yet another hole for it.

For those of you that have both (I have the Waldo in my Tiger), how do they sound different? I'm guessing you can get more "hair" with the extra gain of the blaster?
"Do not write so that you can be understood, write so that you cannot be misunderstood." -Epictetus

First show: 8/16/69 (Woodstock)
Last show: 3/19/95 (Unbroken Chain breakout)
Member of the Four-Decade Club
Charter Member, President & CEO of OAD (Order of the Ancient Deadheads)
User avatar
TI4-1009
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1489
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:27 am
Location: Upstate NY- Toodaloo

Re: to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby bluemule » Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:07 pm

TI4-1009 wrote:I got a Waldo buffer for my SG/Wolf project, but I also have the GGG blaster coming. Not sure yet which- or both. If I go with the blaster I'm pretty sure I'd want it switched so I could turn it off for straight SG stuff if I wanted to, and also undecided about leaving the pot in the cavity or drilling yet another hole for it.

For those of you that have both (I have the Waldo in my Tiger), how do they sound different? I'm guessing you can get more "hair" with the extra gain of the blaster?


I built a clone of both the tiger preamp and the blaster in the same guitar. The tiger is more clear and adds that jangly brightness. The blaster is warmer and has the ability to add more punch. With them on exclusively or both on, I didn't notice any hair...just more oomph, volume and milkshake if you know what I mean.
dead, mule, skb, dtb, abb, jgb, moe, phish, buddy guy, blue floyd, old&intheway
bluemule
Rosebud
Rosebud
 
Posts: 40
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2012 2:34 am

Re: to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby milobender » Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:23 pm

I built a clone of both the tiger preamp and the blaster in the same guitar. The tiger is more clear and adds that jangly brightness. The blaster is warmer and has the ability to add more punch. With them on exclusively or both on, I didn't notice any hair...just more oomph, volume and milkshake if you know what I mean.


Did you build your blaster with an adjustable gain? I regularly put both the Buffer and the Blaster in the same guitar, it adds a nice variety, and I definitely get hair when the gain is turned up over about 30 - 40%.
Everything we know is wrong...
www.9mileskid.com
milobender
Jerry
Jerry
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:32 am
Location: SE Wyoming

Re: to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby tatittle » Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:37 pm

I imagine the hair depends on the amp if the primary cause of it is pushing the preamp with extra gain. The most valuable aspect for me right now is the buffer part, it really makes a huge difference in a vintage style pedalboard > amp setup. If you use an effects loop etc. it is less critical I imagine. I don't notice a big difference between my onboard Stratoblaster equipped tone, and that of a pedal 1st in chain, and a pedal can be used with multiple guitars and has no hassle changing battery (remember to unplug that jack Tat!).
There are several guys who will build a pedal for well under $100.

But, I just finished wiring up my 1st OBEL strat (one more boy grateful to Waldo etc.) and I am really excited about how it performs. A buffer is essential with OBEL too I see, as I have one in a pedal and if its not on the treble loss is severe. Having one onboard here is both more convenient and practical tonewise--so thatll be next.
tatittle
Jerry
Jerry
 
Posts: 430
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:44 am
Location: NJ via Bklyn; Detroit; Charleston; Boulder; Miami; D.C.; etc

Re: to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby milobender » Wed Mar 05, 2014 3:48 pm

I'm just finishing a prototype of a pedal with a Blaster, Booster, and Buffer... all in one... any one at a time or combinations... and it can be worn on the guitar strap, or on the floor. The advantage to mounting it on a strap, is the short distance of cable before the Buffer, to drive longer cables... but it'll be fairly large, approx 3" x 4"...
Everything we know is wrong...
www.9mileskid.com
milobender
Jerry
Jerry
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:32 am
Location: SE Wyoming

Re: to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby tatittle » Wed Mar 05, 2014 6:33 pm

Whew. Can it roll joints too? I like it. I was trying to modify an MC2300 to be worn in a backpack for those get up and go jams where tone cannot be sacrificed. :)
Sorry I'm giddy after finishing up my 1st OBEL and being so delighted with the results. Im not sure why I put it off for so long, but it is definitely a significant step forward.
tatittle
Jerry
Jerry
 
Posts: 430
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:44 am
Location: NJ via Bklyn; Detroit; Charleston; Boulder; Miami; D.C.; etc

Re: to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby milobender » Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:45 pm

:D Not yet...

I agree, the OBEL is great... I can't see having a guitar without one now.

I built the Booster/Buffer portion after reading the thread on Boosters recently; and was trying it out with one of my guitars that has a blaster in it, and it really sounded great. The Booster/Buffer combination was really fine on a stock stratocaster setup too; it had that buffer clarity, and enough of a boost to really make the vintage type, low impedance pups full and juicy :smile:
Everything we know is wrong...
www.9mileskid.com
milobender
Jerry
Jerry
 
Posts: 473
Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2008 8:32 am
Location: SE Wyoming

Re: to stratoblaster or to not stratoblaster

Postby tatittle » Wed Mar 05, 2014 11:57 pm

Yeah my tweed especially loves a good boost too.
tatittle
Jerry
Jerry
 
Posts: 430
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 8:44 am
Location: NJ via Bklyn; Detroit; Charleston; Boulder; Miami; D.C.; etc

Next

Return to Jerry Tone

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests