Is it me or the lyrics are quite dark?

Is it me or the lyrics are quite dark?

Postby sarraqum » Sat Apr 01, 2006 6:52 am

This is one of those songs I've listened to quite a lot but haven't paid much attention to the lyrics, until now. And it sounds pretty dark.
Murder, death maybe even suicide thrown in?

Red ribbons and roses in her hair....well, to me that sounds like someone having their brains blown out, for the lack of a better phrase.

If I tell another what your own lips told to me,
Let me lay 'neath the roses, till my eyes no longer see.
...if roses and red ribbons DO mean blood, then these lyrics clearly talk about murder and suicide.

I love this band, I can listen to them for so long and yet they can still surprise you.
sarraqum
Steal Your Face
Steal Your Face
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: UK

Postby strumminsix » Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:58 am

Never like the song. Dark lyrics is an understatement but like you I didn't realize it until years after first hearing it. Just too slow and live cuts drag.
User avatar
strumminsix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 6665
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 8:13 am
Location: Chicago

Postby LazyLightnin » Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:14 am

i love this song, but i agree it should have been left souly to acoustic sets.
LazyLightnin
 

Postby BlobWeird » Tue Mar 06, 2007 5:19 am

hey strummin listen to i think its 6/16/74 at des moines maybe 6/26. its a faster version and I think its great.
User avatar
BlobWeird
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:08 am
Location: Central Jersey

Postby G'Dad » Wed Mar 07, 2007 10:24 am

To me ‘Roses’ seems to be a song of loss, loneliness and secrets. However it is one of my favourites, particularly the acoustic version.

It is one of the songs I often play with a friend of mine and strangely enough while his wife often accuses us of playing depressing songs she does count this as one of her favourites.

But that’s what I like about good lyrics they can mean different things to different people.
G'Dad
Keith
Keith
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 8:53 am
Location: Nottinghamshire, England

Postby bodiddley » Wed Mar 07, 2007 1:54 pm

Personally, I'll take this slow ass tune anyday over "Ship of Fools". I always thought Jer's placement of that as the 3rd or 4th song in the second set just sucked the life out of it.
bodiddley
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 5:22 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Postby BlobWeird » Wed Mar 07, 2007 2:12 pm

Id definitely have to disagree bodiddly. Ship of fools is a classic and a half! But of course to each his own.

"I wont leave you driftin down, but whooaaa it makes me wild. With thirty years upon my head, to have you call me child"

I love that line right there...Such good stuff
User avatar
BlobWeird
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:08 am
Location: Central Jersey

Postby bodiddley » Wed Mar 07, 2007 5:34 pm

Well..I can dig and appreciatte a good "Ship of Fools" now and then when I'm in the right mood. I guess I just don't like where it often got placement in a show.
bodiddley
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 5:22 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Postby Crazy 9.5 Fingers » Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:12 pm

Ship of Fools - HOT!!!!!
Roses - NOT!!!
There are only two mantras. Yum and yuk. Mine's yum.
User avatar
Crazy 9.5 Fingers
Senior Member
 
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2006 12:14 pm

Postby BlobWeird » Wed Mar 07, 2007 7:28 pm

I am alright with roses. Not the greatest but I dont mind it once in a while. Bodiddley: seeing as Ive never seen dead live and I usually skip around on cd's placement meant nothin to me ya know?
User avatar
BlobWeird
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:08 am
Location: Central Jersey

Postby bodiddley » Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:09 am

Elvis Costello actually does a great medley of the two and you can really see just how similar the two tunes are.
bodiddley
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 5:22 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Postby BigJilm » Thu Mar 08, 2007 7:50 pm

im not a huge fan of either, i like both of them in the right mood, but those songs always seem like a real buzzkill cuz they always seem to throw them in during the wrong part of the show. Same with songs like El Paso or Mexicali Blues. I like El Paso, but after hearing a thirty-minute long acidsoaked dark star, im just not in the mood to hear a cowboy tune, id much rather hear the other one or eyes or sumthing that keeps the mood goin, its like a rapidly moving train coming to a complete stop within a few seconds
BigJilm
Pigpen
Pigpen
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:48 pm
Location: Reynoldsburg

Postby LaughingBones » Fri Mar 09, 2007 3:20 am

1/10/78 gets to me still till this day
LaughingBones
tiger
tiger
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 4:21 pm
Location: Hawaii

Postby Jimkkc » Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:39 am

On the other hand, what could possibly be more out there - more acid-drenched than El Paso at the end of the dark star? I mean, if Dark Star is about breaking down musical, emotional, pyshological, lyrical barriers and creating a space and language that is both unique and original to both the band and the actual "real time" that the music is happening in, then El Paso certainly fits. Sure, Dark Star>Morning Dew or Dark Star>Eye of The World looks "better" on paper - but to be true to the spirit of the music as it is being played, sometimes Dark Star has to go into El Paso. Just my 1.5 cents worth . . .
Jimkkc
Pigpen
Pigpen
 
Posts: 134
Joined: Tue Apr 25, 2006 5:40 pm
Location: Kansas City

Postby BigJilm » Fri Mar 09, 2007 7:55 am

i can dig it i guess
BigJilm
Pigpen
Pigpen
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 5:48 pm
Location: Reynoldsburg

Next

Return to It Must've Been The Roses

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron