Phil's got a new Ritter

Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby zambiland » Wed Oct 23, 2013 5:10 pm

Hm, hopefully not a step backwards.

Image
zambiland
Senior Member
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:13 pm
Location: Boulder CO

Re: Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby TI4-1009 » Wed Oct 23, 2013 5:30 pm

Ugly, ugly, ugly, ugly. I saw him with the first one at one of the first shows with it. It was ugly then.
"Do not write so that you can be understood, write so that you cannot be misunderstood." -Epictetus

First show: 8/16/69 (Woodstock)
Last show: 3/19/95 (Unbroken Chain breakout)
Member of the Four-Decade Club
Charter Member, President & CEO of OAD (Order of the Ancient Deadheads)
User avatar
TI4-1009
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1537
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 6:27 am
Location: Upstate NY- Toodaloo

Re: Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby zambiland » Wed Oct 23, 2013 5:57 pm

TI4-1009 wrote:Ugly, ugly, ugly, ugly. I saw him with the first one at one of the first shows with it. It was ugly then.


This is a new one, different from the Jupiter Eye of Horus. I'm not as concerned about the looks as I am with the sound. The Jupiter didn't really do it for me. I hope this one is better.
zambiland
Senior Member
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:13 pm
Location: Boulder CO

Re: Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby Sparechaynge » Thu Oct 24, 2013 9:22 am

I like Ritters. The Eye of Horus was cool, didn't sound too bad.

Jens said there would be a new one, didn't expect it to be so soon.
Is this a 70's bass or a 00's PC...or a Moon Lander? (It's a moon lander) - Tigerstrat
User avatar
Sparechaynge
Ice Cream!
Ice Cream!
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 5:18 pm

Re: Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby tcsned » Thu Oct 24, 2013 6:10 pm

That one looks cool, not as radical as the first one. I liked the look of the first one, it's over the top for sure but has nice lines. Phil seems to dig it.
User avatar
tcsned
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2730
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:50 pm
Location: Blacksburg, VA

Re: Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby Rusty the Scoob » Mon Oct 28, 2013 6:24 am

The Moduluses are definitely clearer, tighter, punchier and more consistent than the old Ritter was. Maybe he wanted a warmer bass for small rooms?
User avatar
Rusty the Scoob
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2308
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 5:28 am
Location: Concord, MA

Re: Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby zambiland » Mon Oct 28, 2013 12:57 pm

Rusty the Scoob wrote:The Moduluses are definitely clearer, tighter, punchier and more consistent than the old Ritter was. Maybe he wanted a warmer bass for small rooms?


Could be. I keep trying to play my Q6 TBX at gigs but every time it always becomes clear that the Starfire just owns it. No comparison. I want to get the good Modulus sound, and it does sound pretty good, but it's just silly how much better the Starfire sounds. It even makes the band play much better.

Someday I'll have to try a Ritter.
zambiland
Senior Member
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:13 pm
Location: Boulder CO

Re: Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby moonliner » Tue Oct 29, 2013 1:37 pm

Scott Law was going on and on about how great your Starfire sounded.
I hope mine gets close when it's completed!
moonliner
tiger
tiger
 
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:24 pm

Re: Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby Rusty the Scoob » Tue Oct 29, 2013 2:05 pm

Whoah, you have a TBX!!??

I think there's something special about the short-scale semi-hollowbody, my Starfire is a shadow of yours and still gets rave reviews. The notes just hit and duck right out of the way.
User avatar
Rusty the Scoob
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2308
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 5:28 am
Location: Concord, MA

Re: Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby zambiland » Tue Oct 29, 2013 2:25 pm

Rusty the Scoob wrote:Whoah, you have a TBX!!??



Yeah, I got it last January. It's pretty good, not the perfect Modulus, but very nice. Made in 1991, so no truss rod. The bridge is a bit of a PITA (Kahler) and I'm not totally crazy about the pickup placement (a bit too close to the bridge), but it does have that insane TBX low end and the other Modulus goodness. I ordered some SGD pickups for it back when I got it, but David has been taking forever, I'm doubting that I'll get them at all at this point. The EMGs are OK, but I'm looking forward to a smoother, more hifi tone. I've also got an ACG preamp waiting to go in when the pickups go in.
zambiland
Senior Member
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:13 pm
Location: Boulder CO

Re: Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby Rusty the Scoob » Wed Oct 30, 2013 6:49 am

Which EMGs does it have? I'm finding a huge difference between the various types of magnets they offer. The traditional Ceramic they've used for years are the classic snarling, nasally angry tone, the Ceramic/Steel are a lot smoother and the Alnico sound almost completely vintage. They'll make you almost anything you want if you call them up, as long as it fits in one of their standard shapes.
User avatar
Rusty the Scoob
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2308
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 5:28 am
Location: Concord, MA

Re: Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby Bassman » Sat Nov 02, 2013 11:56 pm

zambiland wrote:Could be. I keep trying to play my Q6 TBX at gigs but every time it always becomes clear that the Starfire just owns it. No comparison. I want to get the good Modulus sound, and it does sound pretty good, but it's just silly how much better the Starfire sounds. It even makes the band play much better.
Someday I'll have to try a Ritter.


Hey Edwin,
its Craig, I feel you on the Modulus man. I have been trying for the past couple of years to "love" the Modulus. Its a great bass indeed, has an awesome feel and that unique Modulus sound. I have to say I am digging the Big Brown and Alembic eras much more these days.
User avatar
Bassman
Blues for Allah
Blues for Allah
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Jun 10, 2011 12:41 pm
Location: Long Island, New york

Re: Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby zambiland » Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:48 am

Rusty the Scoob wrote:Which EMGs does it have? I'm finding a huge difference between the various types of magnets they offer. The traditional Ceramic they've used for years are the classic snarling, nasally angry tone, the Ceramic/Steel are a lot smoother and the Alnico sound almost completely vintage. They'll make you almost anything you want if you call them up, as long as it fits in one of their standard shapes.



It's currently the P and J 45s that came with it. I tried DCs in there as well, which did quite do it. I have SGDs on order but it's taking an inordinately long time. I feel like I've already spent the money on pickups I'm going to spend on this bass. Unless Q-tuners become available.
zambiland
Senior Member
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:13 pm
Location: Boulder CO

Re: Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby Rusty the Scoob » Mon Nov 04, 2013 1:10 pm

Q-tuners are no longer available? Dang, I wanted to try those in something someday.
User avatar
Rusty the Scoob
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2308
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 5:28 am
Location: Concord, MA

Re: Phil's got a new Ritter

Postby zambiland » Mon Nov 04, 2013 1:37 pm

Rusty the Scoob wrote:Q-tuners are no longer available? Dang, I wanted to try those in something someday.


Apparently a new version is imminent. Or at least it has been for quite a while.
zambiland
Senior Member
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 12:13 pm
Location: Boulder CO

Next

Return to Phil Sound

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest