
Jon S. wrote:Where is hippieguy1954 when you need him?!![]()
I have not compared the two but it's probably worth repeating what took me too long to learn about my RV300. You MUST "pre-pad" (lower the gain of) the incoming signal at least somewhat to have it sound its best (not distort). I achieve this with my SMS Classic Preamp by first setting its front gain control to 10 o'clock or so, then adjusting its rear pad knob (currently I'm at or around 3PM), then bringing up the volume on my RV300 as wanted.

jkstraw wrote:Jon S. wrote:Where is hippieguy1954 when you need him?!![]()
I have not compared the two but it's probably worth repeating what took me too long to learn about my RV300. You MUST "pre-pad" (lower the gain of) the incoming signal at least somewhat to have it sound its best (not distort). I achieve this with my SMS Classic Preamp by first setting its front gain control to 10 o'clock or so, then adjusting its rear pad knob (currently I'm at or around 3PM), then bringing up the volume on my RV300 as wanted.
+1 - excellent advice for the RV300

strumminsix wrote:Mosvalves should have both channel volume volume and channel presence, right??



spacefunkologist wrote:Id like to get some break-up at small gig volume levels too. AHHHHHHH! This trip never ends!!!

spacefunkologist wrote:Thanks for the replies guys!
Heres my deal. I really only need it for playing small gigs, jammin with buddies and small outdoor parties. I may in the future need more power but I dont right now. Im just wondering if I should spring for something with more juice now and dial it down for small gigs or go wth something less powerful.
Id like to get some break-up at small gig volume levels too. AHHHHHHH! This trip never ends!!!




Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests