Hey guys,
I was wondering if any of you could make a diagram of jerry's mac going into his speakers and into his twin. I have read everything on wald's site but can't seem to quite get it. thanks.



jeffm725 wrote:..............so if I am reading this correctly each speaker was connected directly to the Mac? Speakers weren't wired together?


jeffm725 wrote:..............so if I am reading this correctly each speaker was connected directly to the Mac? Speakers weren't wired together?
JonnyBoy wrote: It's still series hook up just wired farther away. That is like a speaker wire organizer, all in series still.
Smolder wrote:I'm confused... I thought the two channels from the amp were run to each channel of the Mac, and those channels had separate speakers... A wet bank and the others dry. Otherwise, why not just blend the two signals in the pre and run the Mac as a mono block?

waldo041 wrote:
this is an incorrect conclusion how he had things wired. in the early seventies and during the WOS he did run both sides of one twin, only the vibrato was used by jerry, while the normal or dry signal was used as a remoted stage monitor for the other side of the stage(or wherever needed/wanted). back then they did not use monitors in the manner as they are used today. as for running the mac in Mono, that was only done during the WOS and a second mac was used to drive the normal channel monitor behind the drums and on keiths side.
peace,
waldo

Pete B. wrote:This might help (Manual):
http://www.tubebooks.org/file_downloads ... 0Owner.pdf
Here's a bigger pic.
Just curious... it looks like the Com's are not tied together, and the Hot leads go to different ohm taps. Is this a spare amp that has not been fully configured for Mono service yet?

Smolder wrote:Thanks for the clarification. Any insight as to why the far stage monitor would be dry? Or was just for the separate volume control on the twin.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests