I suppose it's probably just a Fender tube head pushed near its limits, right? What would be a good way to get that tone in a pedal form? Or maybe rackmount as long as it's easily switchable.

Rusty the Scoob wrote:I believe you're both exactly right - he just didn't have the wattage to achieve a clean sound.
That Linden pedal looks like what I'm after, but modeled after a Twin or similar head instead an Ampeg. I'm not sure what the differences are, but nobody knows Fender heads better than RUKind!
Rusty the Scoob wrote:Now that I've done all this work to clean up my tone, of course the first thing I do is start thinking about making it dirty again.I'm a big fan of the early years, 69-72, and sometimes Phil gets a real nice grind to his tone.
I suppose it's probably just a Fender tube head pushed near its limits, right? What would be a good way to get that tone in a pedal form? Or maybe rackmount as long as it's easily switchable.
Rusty the Scoob wrote:Not as part of his basic sound, really. He's got them in his rack for sure, but can you point me to a recording where he's using a very obvious and prominent effect like Mike Gordon in Makisupa Policeman, for example?

Rusty the Scoob wrote:Not as part of his basic sound, really. He's got them in his rack for sure, but can you point me to a recording where he's using a very obvious and prominent effect like Mike Gordon in Makisupa Policeman, for example?


Phil Lesh101 wrote:He never Distorted His tone
eeeeee wrote:I would love to try Brad's overdrive. I think it would be just about perfect for this kind of grit. I've been contemplating this recently in conjunction with my current Starfire configuration.

eeeeee wrote:I would love to try Brad's overdrive. I think it would be just about perfect for this kind of grit. I've been contemplating this recently in conjunction with my current Starfire configuration. I also miss the tremolo from the Fenders.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests