tcsned wrote:hogan, was he putting them at the corners facing the crowd?
Vic, stupid question, does your computer have a surround sound card, or do you have a DA/AD converter that has a surround out? If not it's gonna be a huge pain in the ass to get it right. I'd do a cost benefit analysis - how many folks are going to hear it in surround? Is it worth the hassle? If you're doing DVDs and want the best audio quality, I think you're limited to 16/48 in surround mode and can do a full 24/96 in stereo. That is if you recorded the original in 24/96.
I use Logic 7.0 and just looked at it and I vaguely remember using it for a class when I was in grad school - I remember something about using a file naming convention that DVD studio pro would read something like -L, -R, -C, -RL, -RR, -LFE and it out it in the right place not sure if Toast will do that too.
Working on a Mac Pro here ... it has digital ins and outs. Was originally recorded in 24-bit @ 48 kHz, except the audience, which was recorded at 44.1, so it has to be upsampled (no biggie).
The primary audience is me ... LOL ... the house we bought here in Austin has an HD projector with a 100-inch screen and 5.1 surround. So, I'm willing to go through the changes to burn a BluRay with 5.1 so when I'm 80, I can relive my youth. But the rest of the band, and probably other people I might give a copy to, are more likely to watch on a SD system, maybe with surround, maybe not. I like the idea of burning a standard DVD with the option of a stereo mix or 5.1 mix if I can get it happening. The footage is single camera, but very good and even the wide shot visuals are pretty interesting because of the large screen we had behind us. He did a lot of closeup work, too, but mostly of me, which,as you can imagine, irritates the rest of the band no end. Drives them nuts watching the closeups of my fretboard during BIrd Song, that sort of thing.
